6: IDEAL
RAMJET CYCLE
This is essentially the Brayton cycle. Here we have a flowing fluid, so
that it is not useful to draw a pressure-volume diagram. We will instead
represent the engine processes on a Temperature - Entropy (T- s) diagram. This
is the same as an Enthalpy-Entropy diagram (a Mollier Chart) if cp
is constant.

|
Region |
Process |
Ideal |
Actual |
|
a
to 1 |
No
change: supersonic flow: no external compression or suction ahead of inlet. |
||
|
1
to 2 |
Adiabatic
compression, with no work done except volume change |
Isentropic: p,
T increase; To, po constant. s
constant. |
po
drops due to shocks and friction. s increases. |
|
2
to 3 |
Heat
addition |
Constant
pressure. To,
T increase; po
constant.
|
po
drops.
|
|
3
to 4 |
Adiabatic
expansion. No work extracted except that of volume change. |
To,
po constant. T, p drop. |
po
drops slightly. s
increases slightly. |
T-s Diagram

Notes:
1. Lines of constant
pressure slant upwards.
2. Lines of constant
pressure also diverge.
3. Even in the ideal engine,
entropy must increase when heat is added. We thus see that as the fluid is
brought back to the ambient pressure pa, the temperature reached is higher than
the ambient temperature. This is another way of expressing the Brayton cycle
efficiency.
Ideal
Ramjet Analysis
Throughout
this course, we will analyze engine performance by considering one station at a
time.
Example Problem
An
ideal ramjet engine has an isentropic inlet, which decelerates incoming air at
a flight Mach number of 3.0 to a low Mach number without any losses. Heat is
then added by chemical reaction with a fuel whose heating value is 19,000 Btu /
lbm. The altitude is 11000m. The
maximum temperature in the engine is limited to 2000K. The heat addition occurs
at constant pressure, and at a low Mach number. The nozzle is fully expanded,
and has an exit diameter of 1 meter. Find the thrust and thrust-specific fuel
consumption of the engine, assuming constant specific heats.
Station 1
Here we have undisturbed air, just
before entering the inlet of the engine. The stagnation temperature can be
determined from the static temperature and the Mach number using the isentropic
relation.
, and

, and
![]()
Isentropic diffuser, from
Station 1 to Station 2:
Adiabatic,
and no work done except that of volume change:
![]()
Isentropic
(reversible, adiabatic, therefore no losses):
![]()
Constant-Pressure Heat
Addition, from Station 2 to Station 3:
![]()
is specified, for a
given thrust setting. For maximum thrust, this value is limited by the limiting
temperature of the combustor material.
To
find the fuel/air ratio needed to achieve this temperature, we consider the
enthalpy balance across the combustor.
Stagnation enthalpy of the
air + burned products leaving the combustor = Stagnation enthalpy of the air
entering the combustor + sensible enthalpy of the fuel + heat released by
reaction.
We
neglect the sensible enthalpy of the fuel, since it is very small compared to
the heat released by reaction.
![]()
Solving
for the fuel/air ratio,

Isentropic Nozzle, from
Station 3 to Station 4:
![]()
![]()
Fully expanded flow at the
nozzle exit: static pressure is the same as the ambient atmospheric pressure.
![]()
Relating
temperature ratio and pressure ratio,

![]()
Also,
the exit Mach number can be found from:

Let
us pause for a moment and consider what the exit Mach number will be. Since
stagnation pressure is constant throughout this ideal engine, and the specific
heats are assumed constant,

Obviously, the
exit Mach number will be equal to the flight Mach number!
Exit
velocity is
![]()
and
the flight velocity is
![]()
Thrust per unit air mass
flow rate:

and
Thrust Specific Fuel Consumption
, or

Notes:
1. As Mach number increases,
the ramjet pressure ratio increases. The combustor walls must be stronger. For
the same reason, high-Mach number flight at sea-level becomes difficult.
2. As Mach number increases,
the temperature at the inlet to the
combustor increases. When this reaches the highest permissible combustor
temperature, no heat can be added, so no thrust can be produced. Thus this
provides an absolute upper limit on the Mach number at which thrust can be
produced. Of course, the vehicle may not be able to fly at this Mach number,
because we have not considered how much thrust is needed to overcome drag and
accelerate to this Mach number.