UNSTEADY INCOMPRESIBLE FLOW ABOUT AN AIRFOIL
Why don't we worry about the airfoil wake in steady
potential flow? The answer is that there is no net vorticity in such
a wake, as shown in the figure below. There is a region of momentum deficit
formed as the boundary layers from the top and bottom surfaces merge, and
if you go inside this region you will certainly experience shear and hence
vorticity. However, looking from outside this region, we see that there
is no net vorticity in the wake, since the sense of rotation of the upper
and lower parts of the wake are opposite.
In the case of the airfoil suddenly changing circulation, shown below
the steady-flow figure, the wake indeed has a net vorticity, which makes
it roll up into "starting vortex". In this case, we can imagine that the
bottom part of the wake has a higher velocity than the top, so that it
curls around.
What happens when there is a sudden change in the angle
of attack of the airfoil?
The downstream stagnation point stays at the trailing edge (see
Note 1 below). Thus, the bound circulation
changes from
to
. Net vorticity
is now seen across the wake (see Note 2 below). The wake rolls up into a "starting
vortex" of strength
, which convects at
.
Note 1: Here we assume that there is no time lag
in the response of

to angle of attack
a. This breaks down when we try
to explain dynamic lift phenomena at high angles of attack and very high rates
of pitch in incompressible flow. It is also inadequate in compressible flow,
where the freestream velocity is of the same order of magnitude as the speed
of sound.
Note 2: Where does the vorticity come from?
From dissipation of flow kinetic energy in the boundary
layer, due to viscous effects, and the resulting loss in momentum. It is
associated with a drop in stagnation pressure in the boundary layer, and
an increase in entropy.
Unsteady Effects on Lift Per Unit Span
The steady-state lift per unit span is:

This is also:

The quasi-steady lift change due to change in angle of
attack (or, change in bound circulation) is:

.
Note that from now on, when we speak of "lift", we mean "change in lift due
to change in..". There is always a steady-state lift term to be remembered when
the final answer is calculated.
The aspect of interest here is the time-variation of the
lift-change term.
As seen from Kelvin's theorem, when the bound vorticity
changes, and equal and opposite amount of vorticitymust be shed into the
wake. The shed vorticity in the wake induces velocity at the airfoil (as
can be calculated using the Biot-Savart Law), opposing the effect of the
quasi-steady lift change. This "lift deficiency" effect decays as the shed
vortex moves downstream. This is seen in the figure below.
A convenient description of this wake-induced lift loss has
been developed by Theodorsen(1935) for simple harmonic motion of a thin airfoil
in a uniform flow. The Reduced Frequency of the motion is represented as:

. The wake-induced lift loss can be represented as a complex function of k,
C(k)= F(k) +iG(k)
Reference: Theodorsen, Theodore, "General Theory of
Aerodynamic Instability and the Mechanism of Flutter". N.A.C.A. Technical
Report No. 496, Washington, DC, 1935.
Apparent Mass Effect
When you push against air, you have to pay for the acceleration
of the air. The mass of air being accelerated by motion of the airfoil, perpendicular
to its chord, is estimated as the mass of air within the circular cylinder whose
diameter is the chord. Thus,

This is called "non-circulatory lift", since it has nothing
to do with vorticity. Also, note that the freesream velocity does not appear
in the above expression: The non-circulatory lift term can exist
even when the freestream velocity is zero! This is important when
considering the ability of insects to hover. Let's consider the phase of
this lift with respect to the motion of the airfoil.
Consider simple harmonic vertical motion of an airfoil.

describes the displacement z(t).

is the velocity. This is 90 degrees out of phase with the displacement.

is the acceleration. This is 90 degrees out of phase with velocity, and 180
degrees out of phase with displacement. Thus the non-circulatory lift is 180
degrees out of phase with the displacement. These can be expressed also as follows:
Thus, total lift per unit span is given by:

for
simple harmonic motion.
or,
. The quantity within parentheses is called the "circulatory lift" term (note
that the steady-state lift is also circulatory, but here the discussion is about
the components of the time-varying lift.
Thus, the time-varying "circulatory lift" is given as:

for
small-amplitude, simple harmonic motion of a thin airfoil in steady flow. (Remember
that we should add the steady lift to get the total lift)
As

(quasi-steady limit),

.
As

,

. This function
C(k) is tabulated, and is called the
Theodorsen Lift-Deficiency
Function.
For small k, an approximation of the tabulated function is:

where

. This
is "Euler's constant". See the linked graph for a comparison of the approximate
expression with the tabulated function.
Link to Theodorsen Function Table &
charts.
Results for other kinds of motion can be derived conveniently
from this basis. For example,
(a) continuous motions can be synthesized as Fourier
series of simple harmonic motions at different frequencies.
(b) the response to an impulsive airfoil motion in steady
flow can be calculated using the Wagner function, whose calculation includes
the Theodorsen function.
(c) the Kussner function is used to calculate airfoil response
in an unsteady freestream (note: this is not the same as unsteady airfoil
motion in steady flow).
In the following, we include a perspective on the derivation
of the time-varying lift, using the Theodorsen function and the apparent
mass. This touches upon some of the essential features of airfoil aerodynamics,
but does not go into the detailed, explicit derivation of the Theodorsen
function
Small-Amplitude Oscillations of a Thin Airfoil
in a Steady Flow
Reference: Katz and Plotkin, p. 453 -
Assume that the (x,z) frame of reference moves to the left at
a constant speed

. The time-dependent position of the chord is represented by vertical displacement
h(t), positive in the +z direction, and by the time-varying pitch angle

, pitching about an axis through the chord at

. The chordline is then represented by

.
The frame (x,z) does not rotate. Small-amplitude motion is introduced through

or

, where

;

. Then

;

The downwash (by the surface boundary condition, see
Note A) is:

where

is the wake effect. This can also be written as:

.
Obviously,
. Using
the transformation
from thin airfoil theory,
From thin airfoil theory, we can substitute for
and get coefficients An: (see Note A2)
where
for n=0, and
for
n=1,2,3......
Here,
;
; and
for n> 2
Circulation due to downwash w* is (from thin airfoil theory,
see Note A3)
so
that
.
Lift per unit span
where
is the steady part.
NOTE A1:
The airfoil surface boundary condition is
where B(x,y,z,t)=0 describes the surface. If B(x,y,z,t) is expressed as
, we get
;
;
, etc.
From the definition
we get
Now, for pitch-plunge motion,
;
. Thus,
NOTE A2: Carleman-Schwarz Inversion
In the following, the nomenclature used is from the old
books on unsteady aerodynamics. The quantity b is semi-chord, equivalent
to c/2. The coordinate reference x = 0 is at midchord. The leading edge
is at x = -b, and the trailing edge at +b. The normal velocity at the surface
comes from 3 sources:
wb, the induced velocity of the bound vortex
sheet distribution,
wa, the surface motion, and l
the wake-induced velocity.
Thus,
. Using the Biot-Savart Law,
. The
integral equation to be solved is thus:
. This can be inverted using the Carleman-Schwarz inversion:
. This
satisfies the conditions of
at x =b, and is singular at the leading edge, as required by the inversion formula.
Substitute
. Assume
that the wake-induced velocity and the body surface motion can be represented
by series:
and
. Substituting,
.
Note:

. Using these,
Use the integrals:

for
n other than zero, and

for all n.
.
Substituting, we get
Note:
, so that:
where
for n=0, and
for
From the above, note that:
NOTE A3:
Circulation due to
:

.
The third term is zero, leaving