adl | classes index | course home |


GENERAL RESULTS FROM 2-DIMENSIONAL SUPERSONIC AERODYNAMICS

Busemann's expression for pressure coefficient:
 

or,

The first term constitutes the expression from Ackeret's linear theory.
 

From Linear Theory,


 

Airfoil lift coefficient:

, independent of thickness and camber. Camber does not cause lift in supersonic flow.
 


 

Here the first term is the drag due to angle of attack. The second includes the effects of thickness and camber.
 

 


adl | classes index | course home |


WINGS IN STEADY SUPERSONIC FLOW

 

Note the issues:

1. The nature of the first shocks depend on leading edge curvature and sweep.
2. Nature of the overall shock system depends on area rule, modified for supersonic flow.
3. Regions of influence are determined by Mach number. Note that tip effects are confined to the Mach cone emanating at the tip.
4. Information propagation across wing edges (leading and trailing) depend on sweep and Mach number.
Supersonic leading edge: that portion of the wing leading edge where the component of freestream velocity normal to the edge is supersonic. Under these conditions, there is no communication between the upper and lower surfaces through the flowfield. This changes the nature of the flowfield substantially. From an analysis point of view, the upper and lower surfaces flows can be analyzed independently. Singularities placed on the upper surface have no influence on the lower surface, and vice versa.
 
 

Wing aerodynamics in supersonic flow can be analyzed by a combination of:

(a) shock-expansion theory

(b) conical flow

(c) thin airfoil (2-D) linearized theory and second-order theory

(d) singularity distribution
 


adl | classes index | course home |


CONICAL FLOW

a) Flow over a cone:
Observe that properties are constant along rays from the apex.
 

Taylor-Maccoll Equation

(Anderson, Modern Compressible Flow, p. 296-306)
 

Axisymmetric: 

Properties constant along rays: 

Continuity:  ....................................................................(1)
 

Isentropic:  . Then by Crocco's theorem,  .............(2)

Using (2) in (1), for axisymmetric flow,  .................................(3)
 

Euler's equation:

, where  ...........................................(4)

State equation:

..........................................................................(5)

Energy:  ...................................(6)
 

From (4), (5), (6),  .....................(7)

Using  , eq.(7) becomes:

................(8)

This is the Taylor-Maccoll equation.

Ordinary differential equation for  . Solution :  , and  . In terms of  we get
 

See Anderson p.301 - for numerical solution procedure.

 
adl | classes index | course home |


 
 

Singularity Distribution Method in Supersonic Flow

(Bertin and Smith, p.430)
 

Supersonic source:  .

Doublet:  axis along +z
 

Vortex:  , where Q is the strength of the singularity and

hyperbolic radius 
 


 


 

Direct Problems (integrations with known integrands)

Non-lifting: Given thickness distribution and planform, find Cp distribution on the wing.
 
Lifting: Given pressure distribution on a lifting surface of zero thickness, find the slope at each point.
Indirect Problems (or inverse problems): unknown occurs inside the integral.
 Non-Lifting: Given pressure distribution on a wing of symmetrical section, find wing shape.

Lifting: Given a lifting surface, find pressure distribution on it. Need Kutta condition for subsonic trailing edges.

Nonlifting problems are conveniently solved using source or doublet distributions: while lifting problems are usually treated using vortex distributions.
 


adl | classes index | course home |


 
 

THREE-DIMENSIONAL UNSTEADY SUPERSONIC FLOW

Convected wave equation in 3 spatial dimensions and time:
 
.......................................(33)
Assume simple harmonic time dependence:

 

Laplace transform with respect to x:
where 
and
To reduce (33) to an ODE in z, take Fourier transform with respect to y.
Result:  .........................................(35)
where 
 
The solution to (34) is:
(Note: why use a Fourier transform rather than a Laplace Transform? Hint: see the initial condition)
Selecting the appropriate solution for finiteness and/or radiation as  , we have:
............................................(36)
Applying the body boundary condition (as transformed)
...................................................(37)
From (36) and (37):
, and hence,  .

Using the convolution theorem,

........................(38)
 
 

Consider the transform inversions: Laplace tranform is essentially the same as for the 2-D case:

To perform the Fourier inversion, we write:

Since the integrand is even with respect to  ,

. The integral has been evaluated in Bateman:

for

, and = 0 for  . Finally,

for  , and = 0 for 
From Eq. (37), non-dimensionalizing by the wing semi-span and the reference semi-chord,

.......(39)
 

where 

.

If  is known everywhere in the region of integration, then (39) is a solution. However, often  is unknown over some portion of the region of interest.

Recall that:  This is generally unknown off the wing.

Exceptions:

(1) Thickness problem:  everywhere off the wing.

(2) Supersonic Leading Edge:

Certain geometries, above a certain Mach number, will have undisturbed flow off the wing even in the lifting case. For these supersonic planforms,  off the wing as well.

(3) Even in the most general case, there will be no disturbance to the flow ahead of the rearward facing Mach lines,  originating at the leading-most point of the lifting surface.
 


adl | classes index | course home |


Let us look at the second case, above: the Supersonic Leading Edge:
If the tangents of the forward-facing Mach lines (Eq.39),

are sufficiently small, i.e.,  , then the regions where  is unknown, and  , will vanish. This is called the supersonic planform case.

The mathematical problem for these planforms is essentially the same as for a "thickness problem", whether or not lift is being produced. This is because these is no communication between the upper and lower surfaces. However, in the lifting problem,  changes sign across z=0.

The Mixed Boundary Condition Problem

Analytical solution is not possible; numerical methods must be used. The BOX method is coinsidered here.
 


adl | classes index | course home |


Box Method

Integral equation (39) is approximated by differences and sums:
is approximated by
 

...............................................(40)

where  and

are the dimensions of the "aerodynamic box".

= aerodynamic influence coefficients; the velocity potential at point (ij) due to a unit "downwash"  at point (kl).

Equation (40) can be written in matrix notation as:  ...............................(41)

The system of linear equations can be separated out as:
 

.............................................................(42)

where N1 = # of boxes where  is known,  is unknown (these are generally on the wing)

           N2 = # of boxes where  is unknown,  is known (these are generally off the wing)

Using the last N2 equations of (42):  .......(43)

Solving for  ,

,

In regions where  ,

..............................(44)

Using (44) in the first N1 equations,

, or

...................................(45)

Note: In evaluating the "aerodynamic influence coefficients" it is essential to account for the singular nature of the integrand along Mach lines. This requires analytical integration of (39) over each box with  assumed constant and taken outside the integral.


adl | classes index | course home |

Aerodynamic Flutter Derivatives for a Flexible Wing:

 

The Box Method

Ref:
Pines, S., Dugundji, J., Neuringer, J.. Journal of Aeronautical Sciences, October 1955, p. 693-700

 

"Box method for generalized air loads on an oscillating flexible wing in supersonic flow".

Wing is represented by a grid of square boxes.

Influence of boxes on each other is determined.
Aerodynamic pressure influence coefficients are tabulated.

Potential Equation (linearized, unsteady, for supersonic flow)

, or

Wing is divided into a lattice of square boxes. Each square is allowed to oscillate harmonically as a flat plate about it center  . The vertical deflection is:

Vertical velocity is:

As boxes get smaller,  and  get smaller. So

Each box has 2 degrees of freedom: tranaslation and local angle of attack.

For a wing with supersonic leading edge and harmonically oscillating boundary condition on the z=0 plane, [NACA TR872, 194:

where  , and  = downwash velocity, and the region S extends over the forward Mach cone of any receiving point (x,y).

The normal velocity is assumed constant over each box, but varies, box to box.

where  is the area of the box j included in the forward Mach cone from 
. Pressure at (x,y) is given by:

.

Substituting for 
 

Non-dimensionalize with respect to length of the sides of the square box, s.


 

. Then  where  is the pressure influence coefficient.

where  and 
 

Pressure influence coefficient is the oscillating pressure at point  caused by an oscillating unit normal velocity of the box j. The pressure influence coefficient is a function of M, k, and the difference in coordinates between  and the grid box j. This difference is in numbers. Thus, generalized influence coefficients can be tabulated.
 


adl | classes index | course home |


Application of pressure influence coefficients to the determination of flutter derivatives.

 

.
 

Substitute the downwash:


 

Work done by aerodynamic forces

. Assume that the pressure is constant over each box: Work done by the pth mode against the aerodynamic forces of the qth mode:

This involves matrix multiplications of the mode shapes of the wing with the pressure influence coefficients.
 
 

Pressure Influence Coefficients

. This applies for a square which lies completely within the forward Mach cone of the receiving point. These coefficients are tabulated for given geometries.
 

Treatment of Subsonic Leading Edges

Problem: Upper and lower surfaces interact. The approach here is to construct an imaginary "diaphragm" extending up to the Mach cone. This diaphragm will have unknown normal wash. The wing+ diaphragm will then have supersonic edges. There is zero pressure differential across the diaphragm: this determines the normal wash. Significance of Mach 1.414:
. The Mach line touches the tips of the square boxes. For M<1.414, the forward Mach cone emanating from the center of a square box cuts across the two sides as well as the front of the square box" Neighboring boxes at the same chordwise location will influence one another.
 


adl | classes index | course home |